Posted in Top Ten List

My Top Ten Favorite Movies of 2024

Written by Markus Robinson

Movies that just missed my list (11-25):

25. Challengers

24: Lisa Frankenstein

23. Inside Out 2

22. Green Border

21. Evil Does Not Exist

20. Your Monster

19. The First Omen

18. Ghostlight

17. Thelma

16. I Saw the TV Glow

15. The Substance

14. Exhibiting Forgiveness

13. A Different Man

12.  Sing Sing

11. Hundreds of Beavers

Top Ten

10. Love Lies Bleeding

A lesbian love story set in small town 1980’s USA (Louisville). Jackie (Katy O’Brian) is an idealistic female body builder, passing through town with dreams of winning an upcoming body building competition in Las Vegas and earning enough money to make it to California. Lou (Kristen Stewart) is a women hardened by the corrupt town she calls home, as well as a secret life she’s desperately attempting to get away from. Lou works at a gym and it’s love at first sight when she spots Jackie from across the room. They quickly move in together finding hope in each other’s existence. But in this town full of violent men (the most dangerous of these men is Lou’s estranged father (Ed Harris), a psychotic gangster) their love story will be tested. What the movie becomes is a violent revenge story with surrealist elements. And truthfully, the story itself is pretty sparse. But it’s the direction from Rose Glass that allows Love Lies Bleeding to be a far more intriguing film than it undoubtably was on paper. She presents her unabashedly sexual, queer, and at times grotesque vision of the quest for the American dream quite well, centering two leads who give two commanding performances.  Glass makes it a point to focus on these strong women who are not at all helpless, but surrounded by an environment made unsafe due to the brutality of men.

9. Smile 2

I was a fan of the original, but honestly didn’t expect much from Smile 2. I don’t think many did. But as you’ve probably figured out by now, not only did I enjoy this sequel, but I was blown away by how much better it was than the original. Parker Finn is back writing and directing Smile 2 and he definitely went into this production with a specific vision on how to expand the story. Continuing only days after the last film ends, the smile demon virus thing has infected pop icon Skye Riley (played in award worthy fashion by Naomi Scott) as she is about to launch a global comeback world tour, having been out of the public eye in the wake of a huge scandal. If you don’t remember how this whole smile demon works, it’s basically an entity that jumps from host to host by making the infected kill themselves in front of a witness, who then becomes infected themselves by said demon. The newly infected are then terrorized by hallucinations of smiling people for a couple of days (the demon feeds on fear) and then the process starts all over again. There are so many things that Finn gets right here. This movie is nonstop horror entertainment. When I say non-stop, I mean I saw this movie at 10pm (way past my bedtime) and I stayed wide awake, eyes glued to the screen the entire time. The horror choreography aspect of this is fantastic as well, some sequences reminding me of Roman Polanski’s Repulsion, including one horror dance sequence which was uncomfortably amazing. But the best move Finn makes is having his protagonist be a pop star. It’s an absolute stroke of genius. We not only get a great dramatic performance from Scott, but a vocal performance as well. Yes, there are songs and they are low-key bangers. This could’ve easily been a horror musical. Her being a pop star also gives us a completely satisfying ending that made me immediately want a Smile 3. In fact, with a runtime of two hours and seven minutes, Smile 2 is one that I could’ve watched two more hours of.

8. We Grown Now

As a Black man, throughout my decades of movie watching there are things I don’t come across nearly as much as I’d like to. One of which are sensitive Black movies centering around boys. And so, when I find one, it goes right onto my list. We Grown Now was that movie for me in 2024. Set in Chicago’s Cabrini-Green housing in 1992, a place known for being one of the largest public housing communities in the nation. This is a sensitive movie about two young Black boys growing up in that community, processing the world around them. They are best friends and inseparable. Malik (Blake Cameron James) is a dreamer, believing there is a greater world outside of the projects. He lives with his grandmother, little sister and mom (Jurnee Smollett, who is also a producer on this film). His mom struggles as the main breadwinner, with a goal of getting a job that moves them out of Cabrini-Green for good. Eric (Gian Knight Ramirez) lives with his father (Lil Rel Howery) and older sister who is about to leave for college. He is a depressed and defeated child. His grades are low and he has come to believe that he was born in Cabrini-Green and will die there. Writer/director Minhal Baig gives us a personal look into their lives, as we watch the toll this place takes on them. The film’s slower pace asks us to spend some time with Malik and Eric as they watch the people they respect go through hardships and as they themselves process loss, violence, trauma, joy and love. In one scene we watch them cut class and visit an art museum. In another they both stand in front of the fence of the public housing complex they live in and shout “I exist”. Sure, it’s overly sentimental at times, but the movie and this type of storytelling feels completely lived in. These people existed and I was grateful for every moment I had with them.

7. The People’s Joker

The People’s Joker tells the coming of age story of an aspiring clown/comedian who later goes by the name Joker the Harlequin (Vera Drew), as she comes out as a trans woman and finds her place in the world. All of this is set in a version of the DC universe where Batman is a bad guy and an Alex Jones-style political commentator (voiced by Tim Heidecker) is continuously playing on the television set. As a child she is sent to Arkham Asylum by her verbally abusive mother and given a drug that dulls her to the world. As an adult, this becomes her way of masking. Deciding to leave home for the big city (Gotham) to become a comedian (during a time where Batman has outlawed comedy) she befriends a group of “misfits” (all Batman villains) and decides to start an anti-comedy stand up theater in order to skirt the law. There is also a love story subplot that is so perfectly not for the cis-gaze. The love story is presented as the most personal aspect of the film while still keeping true to the notoriously abusive dynamic between the Joker and Harley Quinn in the comics.  Director/co-writer/editor and star of this movie, Vera Drew has constructed a unique trans story told by way of parody and created by the very community it’s portraying (imagine that). And how she gets around the copyright laws is nothing short of brilliant. Paying homage to the DC Universe while also paying respect to the trans community by way of humanizing portrayals, the literal bleeping out of a deadname, a plethora of references and cutting humor pointed at the heteronormative world and visuals that are aesthetically counterculture; utilizing a mixture of green screen, animation and puppetry. The People’s Joker is the best written satire I saw all year and couldn’t imagine this story being told any other way.

6. Heretic

Heretic tells the story of two Morman missionaries, Sister Paxton (Chloe East) who was born into the church and Sister Barnes (Sophie Thatcher) who is a convert. They arrive at Mr. Reed’s house on a rainy afternoon, as he’s requested to hear about the church. Mr. Reed is played by Hugh Grant in my favorite performance of his career.  Grant’s performance is completely irresistible and even though he’s essentially a wolf luring in these little red riding hood characters, it’s nothing short of a delight to watch him effortlessly take over every scene he’s in. Anyway, he invites them in, but they are reluctant at first, informing him that they need another woman present in order to enter his home. He assures them that his wife is in the other room baking a blueberry pie. They enter eager to get out of the rain. Mr. Reed is one part hospitable and charming and one part creepy debate lord. Once the girls begin to talk with him, they quickly realize that he knows more about religion than they do. It seems to be his obsession. The girls become uncomfortable with the types of questions he begins asking them. At times he ridicules their faith and at one point he claims to have discovered the one true religion. Also, there is still no sign of his wife. And a candle on the coffee table which Mr. Reed had lit is labeled “blueberry pie”. Soon after, they discover they are locked in. But Mr. Reed gives them an option for escape. Two doors in the back of his house. One marked “belief” and the other marked “disbelief”. They simply have to choose. Why I spent so much on this set-up is because it’s absolutely indicative of how tantalizing, meticulous and wonderfully intricate this cat and mouse script is throughout. Starting off as a horror of politeness and complicity, as the movie evolves filmmakers Scott Beck and Bryan Woods navigate us through what becomes a theological thriller that was absolutely made for people like me. If you’re a little nerd and this kind of religious debate stuff is enjoyable to you, then Heretic will scratch that itch mighty good.

5. Wicked: Part 1

Who am I fooling? Everyone reading this has already seen Wicked, so I’ll make this short. Wicked is basically The Wizard of Oz fan fiction, “and make it a musical”. And it’s everything I could’ve asked for from a big-screen adaptation, is what I said both times I paid to see this in theaters. It begins with Galinda (Ariana Grande) announcing the death of the Wicked Witch, who we discover is named Elphaba (Cynthia Erivo). The film is told as a flashback, recounting the young misunderstood Elphaba, treated badly because she was born with green skin and her subsequent and unlikely friendship with Galinda. This is a two hour and forty minute “part one” that again, I saw twice because it’s so good. Also, being instantly engaging doesn’t hurt. Props to director Jon M. Chu for delivering a vision that sucks audiences in whether you’ve seen the stage play or not.  Every single choreographed musical number works in the exact way you need it to in order to compliment these beloved songs. Nobody is Kristin Chenoweth, but Grande gets damn close, nailing the cadence and mannerism that define her as this self-absorbed lead mean girl. She earns every hair toss. Erivo is a powerhouse both vocally and theatrically. Jeff Goldblum is Goldbluming. In fact, when he enters the film in the final thirty minutes is when things really take flight (pun intended). Not to say that the first two-plus hours wasn’t selling, but the third act is perfection and is everything everyone you know has hyped it up to be. If you cry at the end of this, I DO NOT BLAME YOU.  Side Note: There are many sociopolitical themes throughout the film which elevate the story into something very politically relevant, but you know my left leaning ass loved that the idea of manufacturing consent comes into play more than a few times throughout.

4. lo Capitano

Nominated for an Academy Award in the Best International Feature category during last year’s Oscars and released in the states in 2024, lo Capitano tells the story of two Senegalese teenagers, Seydou and his cousin Moussa who have been secretly saving money to travel to Europe with dreams of becoming famous musicians. When Seydou tells his mom he wants to leave, she becomes enraged and forbids him to go, informing him that many have died doing what he’s thinking about doing. Others tell the boys similar things, reenforcing the idea that this journey is a death sentence, not only by way of the elements but also the dangers that arise from soldiers, thieves and smugglers looking to take advantage of travelers. But these two are persistent and leave in secret to begin an odyssey that will take them across the Sahara and the Mediterranean. The way director Matteo Garrone chooses to frame the beginning of this film is almost like a Disney live action. Everything is lighthearted and hopeful. These teenagers are presented as just that; kids. They are relatable, they crack jokes and listen to music with their friends and are innocent to the ways of the world. In the beginning their enthusiasm is infectious. This is what makes the brutal reality of what they see and go through during their journey so hard to watch at times.  There were more than a few moments when I audibly gasped. In addition to the unflinching storytelling, Garrone’s use of magical realism is done so beautifully and with utmost respect for all of the immigrants who set out on treks like this every day and don’t make it. This viewing experience is elevated even more by the performance of Seydou Sarr who plays the lead, giving a powerhouse performance that allows audiences to feel every second of his anxieties, fears and hope. This movie does not shy away from the more brutal aspects of immigrant journeys. It may sound silly, but I’m grateful that no punches are pulled. I haven’t felt this way about an immigration story since I saw Cary Joji Fukunaga’s Sin Nombre.

3. Babygirl

Romy (Nicole Kidman) is the CEO and founder of a large company. In public she must maintain an outward veneer of confidence and dominance, as she works around a slew of older male executives. In her private life she is unsatisfied physically and emotionally. She wants nothing more than to be dominated in a very specific and high-risk style of BDSM. She loves her husband and kids and feels the need to keep this part of herself repressed, as this is more than an embarrassment for her. There are points in this movie where she goes so far as to proclaim a hatred for herself and this part of her which she sees as dark and monstrous and the thing that will never allow her to lead a “normal” life. One day a handsome young intern enters the scene and she becomes drawn to his effortless assertiveness and dominance.  This reminded me so much of Michael Haneke’s The Piano Teacher, a film equally as daring and (at times) uncomfortable as what writer/director Halina Reijn has delivered here. Nicole Kidman gives my favorite performance of the year; one which is completely vulnerable and exposed. As Reijn maintains a show don’t tell examination of this “fetish”, we watch as her protagonist is dominated and degraded and then given very specific forms of affection and praise. For many of the sexual sequences the camera is right up in Kidman’s face. While she has orgasms, while she sobs post orgasm, the camera is unblinking. Through Kidman’s performance we see everything from the visual pain and anxiousness which comes from a reluctance to be seen as vulnerable, to her full-on embrace of the transformation that happens when this intern helps her fantasies become reality. This is an absolute masterclass of acting from Kidman.  What I believe Reijn and Kidman have achieved here is something quite interesting and layered and controversial and more than simply a throw away romance novel. It supersedes expectations on so many fronts. Including making this character highly flawed. Romy is a character that we are meant to root for and sympathize with, but also who engages in flawed, unethical and morally questionable activities in order to navigate the even crueler and oppressive world around her. Babygirl has so much to say about shame, sexuality and women.  

2. Late Night with the Devil

In the 70’s a late-night talk show called Night Owls hosted by Jack Delroy (David Dastmalchian) gains national popularity, but is always coming in second to Johnny Carson’s Tonight Show. After Delroy’s wife passes away, he disappears from the public eye. He returns in 1977 to plummeting ratings and an expiring contract. A desperate Delroy plans a Halloween episode that will air during sweeps week which he is positive will get him enough attention to finally push him into that number one spot in the ratings. His idea is to showcase a young girl who is supposedly possessed by the devil. This is technically a found footage film and so we know this night doesn’t go well from the very beginning. In fact, during a brief prologue we find out that the episode we are about to see is known as the television event that shocked the nation. Feeling like a total time capsule of a movie, filmmaking duo Cameron and Colin Cairnes take us to 1977 and for 90 minutes create an atmosphere that feels as if we are sitting at home in front of our televisions watching an authentic late-night talk show program. The authenticity factor is taken up a notch by Dastmalchian’s performance, nailing the cadence, mannerism and somewhat corny charisma of the stereotypical American host. As for the story itself, it’s a slow but playful burn. As segment after segment passes and unsettling and more unexplainable things being to occur on-set, our anticipation for the possessed girl to enter the story grows more and more. The Cairnes make this form of storytelling look effortless. While there were many entertaining horror movies in 2024, as someone who grew up on late-night talk shows, Late Night with the Devil is my favorite of the lot. Though this isn’t technically the scariest horror movie of this year, the combination of a very personal nostalgia and my love for a good creepy tale, allowed this to be such a comfort watch for me.     

1. Didi

Many of the films on my list are completely interchangeable with one another (in a good way). But my top slot is usually reserved for the movie (if there is one) that has something I relate to on a deeply personal level, over any other film. In 2024, that film was Didi. Filmmaker Sean Wang’s coming of age story, set in Fremont, California (Bay Area, stand up) follows Chris (also known as Didi, which is a term of endearment meaning “younger brother” in Mandarin) during the summer before high school. Chris is an acne ridden, braces having, voice cracking every five seconds, stubborn and outgoing, but also awkward kid who just wants to fit in. He hangs with his friends. They talk about girls and film themselves doing stupid shit for YouTube all day long. The movie takes place in 2008, so YouTube was still a relatively new thing. There is also a heavy use of MySpace and instant messenger throughout. But being a teenager is hard. And Wang does well to capture the frustrations and anxieties that come with being that age. As well as making the character of Chris, a teenage boy that at times is very unlikable, making nonsensical decisions that lead to mistakes which hurt the feelings of the people who love him. These aspects are what gives this movie life. Not only does Wang capture the time and place, the clothing, the lingo and the technology, but he captures the teenage point of view. This is the best coming of age movie of 2024. And if you grew up anytime around this era and/or grew up in an immigrant household then Didi will hold a special place in your heart.  

Follow me on Twitter (X) @moviesmarkus and Instagram @moviesmarkus1

Posted in Movie Review

When Evil Lurks

Rating: 2.5 out of 5.

This Argentinian horror written and directed by Demián Rugna has been touted by some as one of the best horror movies of 2023, for reasons I don’t fully understand.

When Evil Lurks tells the story of two brothers living in a remote village who find themselves having to stop the spread of a demon who has possessed a local man. The man has been infected by said demon for so long his body is distended and morphed into a bloated mass of boils and puss. It is discovered that the demon spreads like a virus if shot (or killed improperly?). As the story moves forward, we find that at times both humans and animals can become contaminated by merely coming in contact with an infected person or someone who has been around an infected person. For example, at one point a dog becomes possessed by simply sniffing the clothing of someone who came in contact with a possessed person. Yeah, the rules here are a little murky, and because of this the rules are explained and reestablished throughout the movie up until the very end. And even then, I feel like I needed more time with these people in order to fully understand the lore behind a form of possession which was new to me, but that so many of the townsfolk seem to have extensive knowledge on.

The hysterical delivery/nature of this movie is confusing as well, as this is not a comedy. I caught myself laughing at scenes that in retrospect I don’t believe are played for laughs. This has something to do with the smattering of telenovela-level acting within the film, but also, I can only imagine how much better this movie could’ve been as a dark comedy. Rugna’s decision to play this entire thing straight allows for many visuals (specifically the vomit and snot eruption sequences) to come off as confusing.

That said, I have to believe the primary draw of this film are the kills and the scares, because all of that stuff is quite good.  The setups may not be the greatest, but the actual point of impact is consistently gasp-inducing. As a horror film, there are things to admire here. It’s the in-between moments that only serve as a distraction from the director getting to show off.

Final Thought: Watch this for the visuals, I guess. Again, there are many superbly designed horror sequences, with some wonderful use of practical effects. If you are into horror visuals specifically, Rugna is as talented and creative as they come. It’s simply difficult not to become increasingly disinterested in a plot that becomes more cumbersome over time. And paired with its tonal issues, When Evil Lurks is an overall disappointment due to how intriguing the setup was. 

Follow me on X (Twitter) @moviesmarkus and Instagram @moviesmarkus1

Posted in Movie Review

 Skinamarink

Rating: 3.5 out of 5.

Making the rounds in underground horror circles, “Skinamarink” has some saying it’s a total borefest and others proclaiming this to be one of the scariest movie experiences they’ve ever had.    

Written and directed by Kyle Edward Ball, set in 1995 and shot in a way that feels as though you are watching a low-fi home movie, “Skinamarink” follows two small children who wake up in the middle of the night to find their father is missing and all the doors and windows of their house are gone. Not shot in real time but unfortunately feeling like it is, what we get is a movie where we never see the children’s faces and are left to watch this story play out through a series of blurry shots of the ceiling, corners of the living room, dark hallways and a television set playing old cartoons, as the kids speak off-screen attempting to piece together what is going on. Their voices are also accompanied by ambient “house noises” and overmodulated and warbled sounds that mimic the playback of an old VHS cassette tape recording.

I get it. That all sounds wildly unwatchable. But shockingly it’s not, as Ball constructs these visuals in a way that delivers on that creepy feeling of watching something we shouldn’t be watching.  

Slow to start, Ball does establish a clear story which captured my curiosity early on. And while I didn’t care for the final twenty minutes of “Skinamarink”, which ditches the plot entirely and ventures off into this purely experimental realm of confusing sights and sounds and “cool camera tricks” (and there is nothing in this that could justify the hour and forty-minute runtime), there was definitely a few segments where I could clearly see the film’s full potential as a horror that would make you think twice about checking for monsters under your bed.

When replaying this movie over in my head, I’m acutely aware that not much happens after a certain point. I am also aware that for much of this movie I watched it with my stomach clenched and at times through my fingers. And for me, this is a huge part of what makes a scary movie work.

I’ve seen some reviews label “Skinamarink” as art, as in it’s more of an “art piece” than a movie made for entertainment purposes. But I truly believe the filmmaker’s intent was to create a disturbing horror on par with something like “Paranormal Activity”, while also attempting to hold true to his low-budget, “what if David Lynch directed “Poltergeist”” vision. While I don’t believe this experiment will be as much of a mainstream success story as “Paranormal Activity”, “Skinamarink” does achieve the disorienting visuals mixed with unnerving atmosphere, which makes this experimental film an effective horror watch in the right setting; alone at home in the dark. 

Final Thought: The theories behind what is actually going on in this movie will definitely be fun to talk about for those who can make it through. Is this a fever dream? Is this real life? Is this some sort of purgatory? Is there someone or something in this house that is making all of this happen? Is this movie even good? That said, I understand why people dislike this film, as it is an endurance test. On top of that, I understand that “Skinamarink” may be a movie that is more interesting to talk about than it is to actually watch. And so, I cannot fully recommend it to everyone. But I am glad it exists.

Follow me on Twitter @moviesmarkus and on Instagram @moviesmarkus1