Posted in Movie Review

Backrooms

Rating: 4 out of 5.

Going into this I’d only seen a few episodes of Kane Parsons’ viral online series, but I do remember the feel of it reminding me of a modern-day The Blair Witch Project. And not solely because of the handheld, found-footage, VHS aesthetic, but also the overall “I don’t think we’re supposed to be watching this” feeling ever-present in his productions. Creating the series when he was 16-years-old and hired at 19 by A24 to direct a feature-length adaptation, at only 20 years of age Parsons’ vision hits the big screen.

Not fully abandoning his grainy VHS style wheelhouse, the story does begin with a handheld camera sequence, a great entry point no matter if you are viewing as a fan or had never heard of Backrooms before. Basically, you don’t have to have seen any of the series before watching the movie.

The main story is shot more cinematically, set in 1990 where we follow Clark (Chiwetel Ejiofor) a furniture store owner whose life has fallen apart. He’s been kicked out of his house and now lives in his store. He sees a therapist named Mary (Renate Reinsve) and makes lackluster attempts to work through the anger and resentment he has towards his ex-wife. One night, during a random power outage (power surge) Clark catches a sliver of light coming through one of the walls. When he puts his hand to it, he falls through revealing a seemingly endless series of fully lit office/department store style rooms on the other side. These rooms are recognizable as the soleless innards of the spaces you may be picturing (accompanied by the familiar buzz of fluorescent lighting), but every room is slightly off. One room might have a bunch of furniture stacked in the center of it while another has a door in the floor, or a chair half sunken into the ground, or a stop sign randomly cemented in the middle of an entrance way. But what is this space? Is it a maze? Or an alternate dimension? And is there something else in there with him?    

If you’ve ever worked a closing shift in retail or found yourself working late in an empty office, you will be familiar with the unsettling feeling of occupying a commercial space designed for human activity that suddenly seems abandoned. This eerie idea of liminal space permeates the entire film.     

With Backrooms, Parsons achieves his goal of creating a feature length episode expanding on the original series. His strong vision which contains a myriad of well-choreographed surreal sequences, visually pulling from such places as The Texas Chain Saw Massacre and David Lynch’s dreamlike aesthetic, will be the reason for this film’s success.        

The main story revolving around mental health is the flattest aspect of the movie. Not to say that Parsons’ attempt at linking the therapy stuff to the events happening in the backrooms doesn’t work. But some of the exploration of childhood trauma/emersion therapy ideas tackled in the Clark and Mary sections as well as a lot of their dialogue generally comes off as a bit too on the nose and uninspired for a movie this visually adventurous and strange.

Final Thought: This is a film where the visuals carry the story. Which makes a lot of sense since Backrooms was born out of a series that was driven by its visuals rather than dialogue or characters. Again, I’m no expert, I’ve only seen a few episodes. But in regards to the film, having characters or even the story itself overshadowed takes very little away from the viewing experience. In fact, in a movie littered with well-thought-out sequences, the final dialogue free minute of Backrooms was a real “aha moment” for me. A door opening moment revealing some larger more profound ideas at play and elevating my entire viewing experience, giving me a real paranoid feeling walking out of the theater. And that is all I could ask for after watching any well-made horror.

Follow me on Twitter @moviesmarkus

Posted in Movie Review

Tuner

Rating: 3.5 out of 5.

Harry (Dustin Hoffman) runs a piano repair business and Niki (Leo Woodall) is his apprentice. Niki is a piano virtuoso, but doesn’t play anymore because he suffers from hyperacusis, a condition that essentially means he’s allergic to loud noises and must wear earplugs all the time. This condition also means that (for the sake for this story) his sensitive hearing makes him perfect for cracking safes.

The movie opens with Niki and Harry tuning a piano for a very wealthy client. Making house calls together we get to see how close these two are (like father and son). A large part of Tuner is built on the compelling chemistry between characters and so much emphasis is put on “sitting down and getting to know you” scenes, where we become familiar with characters through slower paced bonding sequences. Whether it’s conversations between the Niki and Harry characters, or Niki and his love interest Ruthie (Havana Rose Liu), or when Niki falls in with a group of criminals, theses bonding sequences do nothing but favors for one’s investment in and the watchability of this movie.

Though I haven’t mentioned it yet, this is a heist movie. But writer/director Daniel Roher (Navalny) does present a quieter more delicate type of heist movie, that along with a classic jazzy heist score, allows this film to seem timeless. Think Baby Driver but turned down to a five. The casting of Woodall also helps, as he has one of those Tom Hardy, could’ve been a leading man in any era, type of faces.

The outline of this movie is very recognizable, or some may even call it “cliché”. A love story between a poor but handsome troubled young man and an ambitious and empathetic beautiful young college woman. Money problems arise and this poor but handsome troubled young man must resort to engaging in some criminal activities, but in secret and for a good cause because he’s not really a bad guy. It’s nothing you haven’t seen before, but it’s very done well. And that again turns into an argument for its watchability.

For all it has going for it, Turner does stumble a bit in its third act. For one, the film never quite hits the peak emotional impact that Roher strives for. When certain tragic events occur or the culmination of the love story plays out, it doesn’t hit in a way that would have you reaching for a tissue. But this isn’t the biggest issue. The biggest issue stems from a single forced plot contrivance that was so distracting and such an unnecessary “how convenient” moment, that for the final 20 minutes the cliché-ness of it all that I’d found quite enjoyable became far less enjoyable and sadly much more exposed.

Final Thought: Because it isn’t flashy or “new”, Tuner is a movie that is destined to be lost in the shuffle. But in an age of soulless sequels and unwanted reboots, I must again give props to Roher for making a movie like this. Because making movies using concepts and storylines that have been done to death, but making them well, will always be worth a watch.    

Follow me on Twitter @moviesmarkus